|
Post by marchesarosa on Mar 14, 2011 17:31:30 GMT
The lady who had a paper on the genesis of winds - "Where do winds come from? A new theory on how water vapor condensation influences atmospheric pressure and dynamics" - that could not be published because there was no-one qualified to "peer-review" it? www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/10/24015/2010/acpd-10-24015-2010-discussion.html Seems the alternative of on-line peer review is useful. Update from Anastassia thanks to Jeff Id on theAirVent noconsensus.wordpress.com/2011/03/13/update-on-winds-paper/Some of the readers may still be interested the fate of our draft paper “Where do winds come from?” and our condensation theory as originally highlighted on The Air Vent here. A second referee was appointed –- many thanks to all of those that helped with that. Now we wait for their judgements. In the meantime, several substantive comments and replies have been posted. We believe that responding to these comments has clarified our presentation and helped identify and address some misunderstandings. Again we are grateful to all those who have contributed. The open discussion was extended until at least April 7th, 2011 (from the original deadline of December 10th, 2010).
We are glad to be part of this new way of assessing and refining science and invite you to join! We welcome comments, criticisms and suggestions. How can we be more convincing? (Additional developments on this topic can also be found here.)www.bioticregulation.ru/news.php?nn=28
|
|