|
|
Post by naymissus on Jun 17, 2011 20:07:42 GMT
This is from a purported physicist with a purported PhD (STA on the Science Board)
And since radiation received from sun goes as cross-sectional area (pi r squared), whereas radiated heat goes as surface area (2/3 pi r cubed), means that you still get a temperature where incoming and outgoing balances.
Many still do believe that she is a scientist!
|
|
|
|
Post by rjpageuk on Jun 21, 2011 12:16:43 GMT
I can only think it is your own insecurities that mean you spend so much of your time trying to belittle others. It is a shame you dont put the same amount of time and effort into learning.
If you want to point out an error go and post it up in the thread over there. Why on earth would you think it was a good idea to post it here?
|
|
|
|
Post by naymissus on Jun 21, 2011 12:38:35 GMT
I can only think it is your own insecurities that mean you spend so much of your time trying to belittle others. It is a shame you dont put the same amount of time and effort into learning. If you want to point out an error go and post it up in the thread over there. Why on earth would you think it was a good idea to post it here? I have no intention of getting into argument with a mad woman who purports to be a scientist again It is not just a 'mistake' it is hopelessy wrong. The maths is wrong (any O level student knows immeduately that x 3 is a volume) and the logic is entirely wrong. The heat sink and heat losses are not in balance - the sphere radiates heat far more quickly because of its surface area Mistake indeed! The woman - a self proclaimed PhD Physicist is a fraud Now, you, you asinine pompous little twit You are welcome here if you have any other motive than attacking me; that seems to be your wont from MB to MB . If that is your intention then you will go . I will be happy either way |
|
|
|
Post by rjpageuk on Jun 28, 2011 14:56:25 GMT
Now, you, you asinine pompous little twit You are welcome here if you have any other motive than attacking me; that seems to be your wont from MB to MB . If that is your intention then you will go . I will be happy either way You create a thread the sole purpose of which is to insult someone (without even linking anyone to the thread in question) and you have the nerve to question my motives? What were your motives for creating this thread? It is patently obvious to anyone who bothers to read what STA writes that she is very knowledgable in several fields of physics. I have no idea why you have made it a life goal to try to belittle her, but having seen you use the same tactics vs me it is clear that when you cannot argue with someone in a logical and rational manner you resort to such tactics. It is very sad. |
|
